The Land of Opportunity? – Serving claims from US Courts

The service of the originating claim is a cornerstone of any form of legal proceedings. A matter can progress through the courts, default judgment can be obtained and the successful claimant can be preparing to recover their uncontested damages, when an email from the defendant in question claiming that he has never received any notice of the claim halts enforcement of the judgment.

The procedure for claims originating in Manx courts is reasonably simple. Manx defendants tend to be served by the Coroner, who confirms the particulars of service within the Certificate of Service. This document is accepted by courts as proof of service, and is powerful evidence on the side of the claimant, should there be any question raised as to service by the defendant.

However, as Manx businesses continue to grow and prosper in international markets, we are seeing a rise in the number of claims originating from trade superpowers, most notably the United States of America. This poses the question of how an American claimant is to prove service. It is sometimes difficult to serve a defendant who is resident in the same postcode as the claimant, rendering international service all the more complicated. The U.S. is again unique in that they operate a federal government, meaning each state has its own laws and requirements for service with the characteristics of each State being slightly different. There are two base methods by which Manx service of American claims can be effected.

Standard service with an accompanying affidavit

Some States simply require the Defendant to be served in compliance with the rules of service of the Isle of Man. Much the same as a claim originating in the Manx court, the documents to be served are prepared for service, and sent to the Coroner along with a blank Certificate of Service. Unlike claims originating in the Manx court, however, there is no need for the usual response pack to be included with the documents, given that the response pack is specific to the Isle of Man.

Some States require personal service by law, or the circumstances of the case require personal service. It is therefore advisable to check the requirements before arranging Coroner service, given that both standard and personal service are offered.

Once the Coroner has effected service and returned the Certificate of Service confirming the same, an affidavit can be drafted. This document details the relevant rules of court and an overview of the procedure, confirming that this method of service is deemed acceptable in the Isle of Man. The affidavit can then be more specific as to when the documents were served, who by, and by what method. This document is then to be sworn before a Commissioner for Oaths.

In some States, this affidavit and the accompanying Certificate of Service is considered sufficient proof of service, and the claim can progress. However, certain States wish for a more formal version of service to be undertaken.

IOM RHCJ 2009 – Rule 2.52

Both the Isle of Man and the USA are party to the Hague Convention 1965. This Convention details the requirements for the service of documents from foreign authorities in Convention countries.

Details of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (15 November 1965) (“the Convention”) can be found here - https://assets.hcch.net/docs/f....

A request under rule 2.52 is made to the First Deemster for the service of documents compliant with the Hague Convention. There are specific forms to accompany the application, which can also be found on the HCCH website.

The request is made by letter, with Article 3 of the Convention stating that there is no need for further legalisation or formalities. Upon receipt, the First Deemster will pass the request to the Chief Registrar, who is responsible for the instruction of the Coroner. Once the Coroner has enacted service, the Court then receives the completed Certificate of Service or a statement explaining why service could not be completed. The Coroner also supplies an invoice detailing the cost of effecting service, and the applicant will be liable for satisfying this invoice.

The Chief Registrar will then supply a court-sealed certificate detailing the service of the requested documents, and a copy of the documents served.

Which is preferable?

This depends on the State requirements. Both methods of service might be acceptable, and would qualify in the Isle of Man as effective methods of service. To cover all bases, it is possible to utilise both methods, if the claimant is expecting the respective defendant to be difficult to serve, or simply for peace of mind. Whether jurisdiction is properly asserted over the party being served is often disputed and specific advice on that issue should be sought.

These methods of service are also available to prove that parties to litigation have been served all manner of documents, such as Notices of Deposition, Court Orders and Application Notices.

This article does not constitute legal advice. Specific advice should be sought for any given circumstances. This article was written by Advocate Joe Burrows. Please contact M&P Legal at law@mplegal.im or 01624 695800 if you have any enquiries.

Back to top